Establish the capital requirement
What the money is genuinely for, what it buys, and what milestones it must reach to make the next round or the exit possible. Raising the wrong amount is as damaging as raising nothing.
Fundraising rewards preparation far more than it rewards optimism. Investors are underwriting a small number of things: whether the market is real, whether the company can execute, whether the numbers hold under pressure, and whether the team will behave predictably. We prepare companies to answer those questions on the evidence — before the process starts, not during it.
Who this is for
Common triggers
Our approach
What the money is genuinely for, what it buys, and what milestones it must reach to make the next round or the exit possible. Raising the wrong amount is as damaging as raising nothing.
An integrated model with defensible drivers, unit economics, scenario and sensitivity analysis, and a downside case the board can live with. Investors test the logic, not the presentation.
A coherent story connecting market, product, commercial evidence, team and capital plan — with the awkward questions anticipated rather than avoided.
Stage fit, sector focus, cheque size, jurisdiction, portfolio conflicts and behaviour after investment. A well-targeted shortlist consistently outperforms a broad circulation.
Sequencing, data room preparation, diligence readiness, term sheet interpretation and negotiation support — with an operator's view of which terms shape the company for years.
Typical deliverables
Relevant experience
Our capital work draws on both sides of the table: raising institutional capital as operators, and assessing companies as investors. It spans venture and growth equity, private equity processes, debt structures, public agency funding and public market transactions, alongside workshop delivery on investor readiness with founders, advisors and public agencies.
More about our operator-led modelEngagement example
Anonymised illustration — editable content block
Context
A scale-up preparing a growth round whose model could not survive scenario questioning and whose narrative did not connect its expansion plan to the capital being sought.
What we did
We rebuilt the model around defensible operating drivers, established the true capital requirement and milestone set, reframed the narrative around commercial evidence, and prepared the team for diligence.
Outcome
The company entered its process with a consistent plan, model and story, and could answer downside questions without renegotiating its own case mid-process.
FAQs
Related
Tell us where you are and what decision is in front of you. We will tell you honestly whether we are the right people to help.
Start a conversation