Clarify the objective
Value, timing, continuity, team outcomes and what each shareholder actually needs. Processes fail most often because these were never made explicit at the start.
Transactions concentrate years of decisions into a few months. What determines the outcome is rarely the process itself — it is whether the company was built to be bought, whether the numbers and contracts hold up, and whether the leadership team knows what it actually wants. We work with founders and boards well before a process begins, and stay with them through it.
Who this is for
Common triggers
Our approach
Value, timing, continuity, team outcomes and what each shareholder actually needs. Processes fail most often because these were never made explicit at the start.
Contract quality, revenue durability, customer concentration, key-person dependency, IP position, reporting integrity and governance. These are built over quarters, not fixed in diligence.
How the business is framed to a specific buyer type, why it is worth more inside their portfolio, and where the value creation logic sits — supported by evidence rather than assertion.
Buyer or target identification, information preparation, management meeting readiness, diligence coordination with your corporate finance and legal advisers, and structure and terms interpretation from an operator's point of view.
Day one, first hundred days, and the operating decisions that determine whether the deal thesis survives contact with the combined organisation.
Typical deliverables
Relevant experience
Our transaction work draws on executing and supporting buy-side and sell-side processes, institutional fundraising, public listings and post-deal integration, alongside board and advisory roles with founder-led companies and institutional investors across EMEA and North America.
More about our operator-led modelEngagement example
Anonymised illustration — editable content block
Context
A founder-led business that received an unsolicited approach with no prior preparation and no shareholder alignment on timing or outcome.
What we did
We established what each shareholder needed, ran an exit readiness assessment that surfaced concentration and contract issues, sequenced remediation, and supported the board through evaluation of the approach against continued independent growth.
Outcome
The board made an informed decision on timing with a clear view of value drivers and risks, rather than reacting to the approach on the buyer's timetable.
FAQs
Related
Tell us where you are and what decision is in front of you. We will tell you honestly whether we are the right people to help.
Start a conversation